Blog

How effective was Ringgold flying artillery against the Mexican army?

How effective was Ringgold flying artillery against the Mexican army?

Although offensive artillery tactics featured prominently in U.S. victories throughout the 1846-48 Mexican-American War, Ringgold did not survive the Palo Alto battle. He was mortally wounded leading his battery forward to disrupt a Mexican attack.

How many horses did it take to pull a cannon?

From cavalry to beasts of burden - how their roles changed

Because military vehicles were relatively new inventions and prone to problems, horses and mules were more reliable - and cheaper - forms of transport. Thousands of horses pulled field guns; six to 12 horses were required to pull each gun.

How many horses were in a Civil War battery?

Each of five officers, eight sergeants, and two buglers rode their own horses, so even a mounted battery of 125 men included approximately 110 horses as well as 50-60 wheeled vehicles (guns, limbers, caissons, and wagons).

Does artillery still exist?

As technology improved, lighter, more mobile field artillery cannons developed for battlefield use. This development continues today; modern self-propelled artillery vehicles are highly mobile weapons of great versatility generally providing the largest share of an army's total firepower.

image-How effective was Ringgold flying artillery against the Mexican army?
image-How effective was Ringgold flying artillery against the Mexican army?
Related

Did the US Invade Mexico City?

The United States Army occupied Mexico City from September 14 1847, to June 12 1848. The occupation began with three days of intense and bloody street fighting between Mexicans and U.S. troops. ... Thus, the U.S. occupation of Mexico City involved concurrent and competing dynamics of resistance and cooperation.

Related

Did Vikings fight on horseback?

The Vikings in England never fought as cavalry but used horses for transportation. The Vikings normally avoided formal, set-piece battles because as invaders, they were vulnerable to defeat if caught in the open. Instead the Vikings used guerrilla tactics, and Blitzkrieg, as it were, to confuse and panic the enemy.Nov 29, 2018

Related

Why did cavalry become obsolete?

World War I saw great changes in the use of cavalry. The mode of warfare changed, and the use of trench warfare, barbed wire and machine guns rendered traditional cavalry almost obsolete. Tanks, introduced in 1917, began to take over the role of shock combat.

Related

How many horses were killed during the civil war?

During the conflict it is estimated that between 1,000,000 and 3,000,000 horses died, including, mules, and donkeys. It is estimated that the horse casualties at the Battle of Gettysburg, July 1 and July 3, 1863, alone exceeded 3,000.

Related

What did horses eat during the Civil War?

Feeding, of course, was a critical part of the horses' care. The daily ration prescribed for an artillery horse was 14 pounds of hay and 12 pounds of grain, usually oats, corn or barley. The amount of grain and hay needed by any particular battery depended on the number of horses that battery had at the time.

Related

How were horses treated during the Civil War?

Many died of hoof rot, and green riders packed too much weight on their horses' backs, leaving them unfit for service. The Union Army was debilitating its own mounts, yet it kept calling for more. ... It was not battle that posed the greatest threat to the Civil War's horses but disease, malnutrition, and overexertion.Sep 15, 2015

Related

How big is a 155mm round?

155 mm (6.1″) is a common, NATO-standard, artillery calibre.

Related

Is artillery safer than infantry?

No. Artillery positions will be a major target for enemies who have the capabilities to hit them- counter battery fire, aircraft, etc. Just because it's the safest doesn't make it the most enjoyable, though. In fact, I'd consider several artillery jobs amongst the worst in the entire US Military.

Related

How far ahead of the infantry was the artillery?

  • With both lines formed up in preparation for battle –the artillery, according to Grant, a rod or two ahead of the infantry (a rod being about sixteen and a half feet), the battle report explained that,

Related

Why was the Mexican artillery so good?

  • Lhughesw5/Own Work/Wikipedia/CC BY-SA 3.0 The Mexican artillery consisted entirely of solid shot. In the coming artillery duels, in which Grant would take part, the American artillery had a clear advantage.

Related

What kind of artillery did they use at Chickamauga?

  • “The artillery was generally six-pounder brass guns throwing only solid shot; but General Taylor had with him three or four twelve-pounder howitzers throwing shells, besides his eighteen-pounders before spoken of, that had a long range. This made a powerful armament.” Smoothbore Cannons at Chickamauga. Lhughesw5/Own Work/Wikipedia/CC BY-SA 3.0

Share this Post: